Skip to content

Dollis Hill

9 December, 2013

Mr W.J. JOHNSTON: […] My second question relates to proposed subsection (5). Under what circumstances would the minister contemplate a regulation to exempt a particular port?

Mr T.R. BUSWELL: In relation to proposed subsection (5), it would be distance from community, so that would include Useless Loop—one of my favourite ports!—Cape Cuvier —

Ms R. Saffioti: See how many times you can mention Useless Loop!

Mr T.R. BUSWELL: Salt export through Useless Loop is very important; very important.
Proposed subsection (5) predominantly deals with Useless Loop, and I do not think anyone would argue that it is a useless provision—

Mr W.J. Johnston: You’d better loop back to your answer!

Mr T.R. BUSWELL: Well, it loops back to proposed subsection (2), but it is not a useless loop, even though it would apply to Useless Loop.

Subject: Ports Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 [Legislative Assembly – Consideration in Detail]

Date: 28 November 2013

Hansard reference: p. 6920 [online (pdf)]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: